e-Patient Dave

Power to the Patient!

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Speaker
    • Corporate & associations
    • Healthcare
    • Videos
    • Testimonials
  • Author
  • Advisor
  • Schedule
  • Media
    • Recent coverage
    • News coverage 2010-2014
    • Book mentions
    • Press resources
  • About
    • About Dave
    • Boards & Awards
  • Resources
    • Patient Communities
    • For Patients
    • For Providers
    • Speaker Academy
  • Contact

April 19, 2013 By e-Patient Dave 4 Comments

Continue the #Quality2013 discussion!

BMJ-IHI bannerI just finished a talk at the Internatioal Quality Forum hosted by the British Medical Journal and the Institute for Quality Improvement. (The Twitter hashtag is #Quality2013.) What a thrill to talk here – making the case to Let Patients Help!

There was a timing glitch, though – they accidentally ended my talk 15 minutes early, so there was no question and answer. Attendees, if you’d like to discuss, leave a question in the comments here.

Filed Under: Events 4 Comments

Comments

  1. Naomi says

    April 19, 2013 at 11:19 am

    Great speech – what a superb insight into how a patient views consultations and their health, and how they can positively input into their diagnosis and ongoing care. Certainly made me consider my approach to patient care. How can we ensure that the information patients are looking at online is accurate and good quality, and not indeed giving them false hope or inaccurate information?

    Reply
    • e-Patient Dave says

      April 19, 2013 at 6:21 pm

      Hi Naomi – thanks for your kind words.

      > How can we ensure that the information patients are looking at online
      > is accurate and good quality

      It’s a deep question, with much uncertainty to it. If you follow Ben Goldacre MD’s work, you know that there’s also much uncertainty about peer reviewed literature, too! (I can dig out some links if you want.) And recent discussion of the new Reproducibility Initiative has revealed that many landmark studies can’t be replicated.

      Then there’s the work of John Ioannidis, documenting that many studies turn out to be wrong later.

      So what is reliable information? How does a doctor encourage

      I know that no matter what I myself say about it, there’s extra credibility to the views of a well respected physician. That’s one reason I invited my primary physician, Dr. Danny Sands, to collaborate with me in the book I’m giving away (as an ebook) through Saturday. He wrote several sections, including his own guide to effective googling. Instructions for getting it free (or buying it) are here.

      As you’ll see, his rules are informative, concise and practical.

      Reply
  2. Lucy says

    April 19, 2013 at 4:22 pm

    So sorry that you were cut short…. I found the presentation inspirational and will not forget the message that you so passionately shared. Thank you.

    Reply
    • e-Patient Dave says

      April 19, 2013 at 6:02 pm

      Lucy, my talks are always of variable length (sometimes chaotically so)… a good speaker can deliver the message no matter what the circumstances. My TEDx talk was just 16 minutes long and was been well received!

      Glad you enjoyed it.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to LucyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Click to learn about Antidote’s clinical trial search engine:

Subscribe by email

Thanks! Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

News coverage

Click to view article


     

    


     
     
 
   
     
     
    


Archives

Copyright © 2025 e-Patient Dave. All rights reserved.