This is an adaptation of a message I wrote last night to some friends who are participating this weekend in PCORI’s workshop this weekend. I wish I could be there, but overseas travel was booked for today, months ago. For newcomers I’ll say more at the bottom of this post, but first, my message to the participants.
PCORI’s charter – its very name – is to develop Patient Centered Outcomes. That raises the question:
Who gets to say what’s patient-centered? We should.
The scientific establishment won’t turn on a dime with this one patient weekend, so what COULD we persuade PCORI and the attending scientists about? My view:
To me the core question of the weekend is: Who gets to say what’s patient-centered? I say, it’s the one who’s in the center. Who else could possibly know if things are balanced around them?
So, I suggest: in any patient-centered outcomes project, patients should participate not just in selecting projects or goals/outcomes (from a scientist-generated menu), but in defining the goals, the desired outcomes, even what they’d like researchers to pursue.
This is a maturing of the patient’s role, and a shift in the researcher’s role to one of partnership rather than “doctor knows best.” The maturing seems to parallel how a kid grows up: [Read more…]